RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04384
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Time in Service (TIS) and Time in Grade (TIG) be corrected.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His attendance at the United States Air Force Academy
Preparatory School should have adjusted his TIS and TIG.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air
Force. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in
this Record of Proceedings.
________________________________________________________________
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial. DPSIPE states that the applicant
enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 16 Jul 2008 for a one-year
period. During the one-year enlistment, he served a total of
5 months and 24 days of active duty before separating on 8 Jan
2009. On 18 Oct 2011, he enlisted into the Regular Air Force
through the Air Force Recruiting Service for a period of 4 years
as a non-prior service (NPS) applicant. He did not meet the
requirements to enter active duty under the prior service
program because he did not have at least 24 months of total
active federal military service. In accordance with AFI 36-
2002, Regular Air Force and Special Category Accessions, the
enlistment grade for NPS enlistees is E-1 and the date of rank
is the date they enlisted into the Regular Air Force. If the
enlistee has over 90 days active duty service and last served in
pay grade E-2 or higher, or is a Service Academy ex-cadet with
over 90 days service, then the grade is E-2. Although the
applicant did serve at least 90 days on active duty service, he
was not promoted to E-2 during his initial enlistment, nor did
he meet the requirements to be considered a Service Academy ex-
cadet.
The complete DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 23 Oct 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. As of
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit
D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
in Executive Session on 30 May 2013, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2012-04384:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Sep 2012, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicants Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 2 Oct 2012.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Oct 2012.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04384
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04384 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Time in Service (TIS) and Time in Grade (TIG) be corrected. On 18 Oct 2011, he enlisted into the Regular Air Force through the Air Force Recruiting Service for a period of 4 years as a non-prior service (NPS) applicant. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05318
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05318 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His grade at the time of entry on active duty should have been advanced based on his status as an Eagle Scout. ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was never told that since he...
Personnel in this category enlisted in the grade airman basic (E-1) with a date of rank (DOR) equal to their RegAF date of enlistment, unless qualified for grade credit under the provisions of Table 2-2 AFR 33-3, Enlistment in the United States Air Force. AFR 33-3, Enlistment in the United States Air Force, Chapter 1, dated 18 January 1985, outlines the qualifications for enlistment (prior service and non-prior service) in the Regular Air Force. As such, based on the referenced AFR 33-3,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02668
This TIG error prevented him from testing for MSgt in 2011 and 2012, and denied him consideration for promotion on both the FY11 and FY12 Master Sergeant Selection Boards. After a thorough review of his RegAF and ANG records, it is determined the applicant did not hold the rank of TSgt while serving in the RegAF and therefore, this DOR is equal to the date of his enlistment. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05395
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05395 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Date of Rank (DOR) to the grade of Airman First Class (A1C, E-3) of 1 Nov 12 be changed to match his Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) of 18 Jun 11. His TAFMSD was adjusted to 18 Jun 11, to account for his reserve time and his...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01143
On 24 Mar 10, the applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserve in the grade of airman first class (E-3) for the purpose of enlisting in the Regular Air Force for a period of four years. According to AFI 36-2604, Service Dates and Dates of Rank, enlistment grade of members with prior ANG or Reserve service is determined by Total Active Federal Military Service (TAFMS) at the time of enlistment. While the applicant contends that he should have been allowed to enlist in the Regular Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01234
Grade Determination for Non-Prior Service (NPS) Enlistees, enlistment in the grade of E-3 is authorized when the applicant meets the following criteria: a. Presents General Billy Mitchell Award certificate showing successful completion of the Civil Air Patrol (CAP) training program. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary which is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04894
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04894 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His home of record (HOR) be changed from Carthage, New York (NY) to San Angelo, Texas (TX). He has been a resident of TX since he joined the Air Force. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00447
The complete DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DPSIPE accurately describes his position by stating, "The applicant feels that the TAFMS requirement is for enlistment in a higher pay grade than last held in the regular component. In reference to AFI36-2002, A4.2, Prior Service Date of Rank and Enlistment Grade, we interpret the TAFMS for enlistment in a higher grade as only...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02082
His Nurse Enlisted Commissioning Program (NECP) scholarship be reinstated. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits B, C and D. 2 ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAMN recommends denial of the applicant’s requests to have his NECP scholarship reinstated and that his DD...